Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
Model | Ford Focus | Toyota 4Runner | |
Engine | 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 140 hp@6000 136 lb-ft@4250 |
4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 270 hp@5600 278 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 102.9 in | 109.8 in | -6.9 in |
Length | 175.0 in | 189.9 in | -14.9 in |
Width | 66.7 in | 75.8 in | -9.1 in |
Height | 58.6 in | 71.5 in | -12.9 in |
Curb Weight | 2645 lb. | 4400 lb. | -1755 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 13.5 gal. | 24.0 gal. | -10.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 39.3 in | -0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.5 in | 57.8 in | -4.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 50.4 in | 56.5 in | -6.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.7 in | 0 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 38.6 in | -0.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.7 in | 57.8 in | -4.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 50.9 in | 55.7 in | -4.8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.1 in | 32.9 in | 3.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 34.3 in | -34.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 57.7 in | -57.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.3 in | -43.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.3 in | -29.3 in |
Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | -26.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.8 ft3 | 9.0 ft3 | 4.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.8 | 46.3 ft3 | -32.5 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.8 ft3 | 88.8 ft3 | -75 ft3 |
2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
2010 | The rear seat is fairly comfortable--if you fit. Many compacts have roomier back seats. see full Ford Focus review |
2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I am ranking the driver's seat high in comfort even though 10 minutes is not enough to be sure. The seat has a lot of adjustability, including height. It feels like sitting on a platform rather than a hammock. The seat felt supportive without being hard. I can imagine it would allow for long distance travel in comfort. see full Ford Focus review |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Head room was great and the seat adjusted vertically with an easy to use lever. see full Ford Focus review |
2011 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat see full Ford Focus review |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
It's tight in the back. Entry and egress are a bit cumbersome in particular for the feet. My shoe size is 9.5. see full Ford Focus review |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Like sitting on concrete. One minor positive was that the lumbar support was decent, but overall lacking in comfort. see full Ford Focus review |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Air conditioner doesn't cool car. see full Ford Focus review |
2013 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Both the Toyota and Jeep have roomy second-row seats that are high enough off the floor to provide thigh support for adults. Only the Toyota offers an optional third row seat, but it's too tight to be of much use. If you want a useful third row in this sort of vehicle, check out the Dodge Durango. The Durango is essentially an extended, less off-road-capable Grand Cherokee. Its third-row seat is about as comfortable as you'll find in this size SUV or crossover. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota 4Runner.