| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Ford Fusion and 2014 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Ford Fusion | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,728 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,841 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,834 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,490 kg | 1,803 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 66 L | 72 L | -6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 983 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,458 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,372 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 965 mm | -5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,354 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 942 mm | 1,008 mm | 941 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 467 L | 464 L | 3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Fusion
| 2011 Ford Fusion Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The front seats are very comfortable, and provide very adequate support for long trips. Side support isn't the very best for hard cornering though. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
All passengers have commented about the generous space and overall comfort of the rear seat. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Controls are easily adjusted to fit any driver. Lateral support is good without feeling pinched into the seat. Dead pedal is perfectly positioned. see full Ford Fusion review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
