| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2007 Cadillac SRX Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2007 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Cadillac SRX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 116.4 in | -9.3 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 194.9 in | -6.4 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 72.6 in | 1.3 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 67.8 in | -12 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 4164 lb. | -663 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.3 in | -1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 58.7 in | -3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 56.3 in | -2.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 38.4 in | -3.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 57.6 in | -9.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 56.3 in | -9.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 41.0 in | -11.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.0 in | -35 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.6 in | -43.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.1 in | -55.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.2 in | -24.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | -35.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 8.4 ft3 | 5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 32.4 ft3 | -19 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 69.5 ft3 | -56.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Cadillac SRX
| 2007 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
My 10 year old son is already over 5 feet and he fits behind me OK. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rooms for me so room for friends to ride without being cramped see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
