| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Engine | 5.2L V8 DOHC-4v 526 hp@7500 429 lb-ft@4750 |
supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 580 hp@6000 556 lb-ft@4200 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,852 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,836 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,918 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,681 kg | 1,882 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 72 L | -11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 950 mm | 5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 897 mm | -13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 759 mm | 18 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 382 L | 320 L | 62 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
