| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2008 Chevrolet Equinox Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2008 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 112.5 in | -5.4 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 188.8 in | -0.5 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 71.4 in | 4 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 69.3 in | -14.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 3699 lb. | -173 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 17.0 gal. | -1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 40.9 in | -3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 55.7 in | 0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 51.1 in | 3.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.2 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 40.1 in | -5.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 55.9 in | -3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 51.4 in | -4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 40.2 in | -9.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 81.4 in (over 2 rows) | -8.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 35.7 ft3 | -22.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 67.1 ft3 | -53.6 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Chevrolet Equinox
| 2008 Chevrolet Equinox Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 264-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat can slide forward and back 8" providing generous leg room for rear passengers. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bucket seats are at a perfect height for easy entry and exit. Also there is a liftable arm rest between the seats for storing purse, etc. which eliminates the need for reaching to the back when the passenger seat is occupied. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Ample leg and hip room. I am only 5foot 4 inches but have a wide posterior. Seat is comfortable for me. My son is 6 foot 3 inches and medium build. He has ample leg and body room. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The rear bench seat can slide forward or back. When slid back, there is ample leg room for even the tallest of passengers. see full Chevrolet Equinox review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
