| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2010 Chevrolet HHR Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet HHR | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 103.5 in | 3.6 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 176.2 in | 12.1 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 69.1 in | 6.3 in |
| Height | 54.9 in | 63.1 in | -8.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3644 lb. | 3155 lb. | 489 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 0 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.6 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 53.5 in | 2.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 50.1 in | 4.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 40.6 in | 1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 39.0 in | -3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 44.7 in | 52.7 in | -8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 50.6 in | -6.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.8 in | 39.5 in | -8.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.8 in (over 2 rows) | 80.1 in (over 2 rows) | -7.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.4 ft3 | 23.8 ft3 | -12.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.4 ft3 | 57.7 ft3 | -46.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet HHR
| 2010 Chevrolet HHR Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
It is roomy and comfortable. see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
The HHR has one of the most comfortable seats for me of most of the cars that I have driven. see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2010 Chevrolet HHR Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
little leg room see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
seat-back very annoying and driving position difficult to get right see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
low roof limits passenger packaging space - poor knee room see full Chevrolet HHR review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
