| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2009 Chevrolet Impala Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2009 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Impala | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 110.5 in | -3.4 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 200.4 in | -12.1 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 72.9 in | 2.5 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 58.7 in | -4.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 3555 lb. | -29 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 17.0 gal. | -1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.4 in | -1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 58.7 in | -2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 56.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 42.3 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 37.8 in | -3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 58.6 in | -6.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 57.2 in | -9.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 37.6 in | -7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 79.9 in (over 2 rows) | -7.3 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.5 ft3 | 18.6 ft3 | -5.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Chevrolet Impala
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Perhaps the largest rear seat in a sedan. Can squeeze three normal adults. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Large seat for my large seat, very good lumbar support, good power adjustments. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 233-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good support for legs and back. Seat adjusts to fit most people. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Wide open... see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 233-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very easy to get in and out of this car. Front seat is roomy and fairly comfortable. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Large trunk space seems to sacrifise rear seat area. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Not enough leg room. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 233-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
When the drivers seat is all the way back there is little rear seat legroom for tall folks. see full Chevrolet Impala review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
