| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Ford Mustang and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 116.0 in | -8.9 in |
| Length | 187.6 in | 204.0 in | -16.4 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 80.5 in | -6.6 in |
| Height | 55.4 in | 74.4 in | -19 in |
| Curb Weight | 3373 lb. | 5466 lb. | -2093 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -10 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 42.8 in | -4.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 64.8 in | -9.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.6 in | 60.8 in | -7.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 45.3 in | -2.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 38.7 in | -4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.4 in | 65.1 in | -11.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 60.3 in | -13.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.3 in | 39.0 in | -8.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -36.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.1 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -2.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.1 | 51.6 ft3 | -38.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.1 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -81.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Mustang
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
