| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Mustang and 2012 Chevrolet Traverse Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,020 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,778 mm | 5,207 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,991 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,412 mm | 1,788 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,564 kg | 2,173 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 83 L | -22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,026 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 1,001 mm | 880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,311 mm | 1,557 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 935 mm | -178 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,227 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 843 mm | -843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 691 L | -312 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 1,948 L | 12.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 3,296 L | 10.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2012 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Although the rear captain seats are quite comfortable, I do not like how they roll forward. There is a track in the floor in which the rear seats fold and slide up behind the front seats. All I notice when in the back seat is how extremely difficult it is to clean out the mud and grit and salt (I live in Canada, we use salt on our roads) that gets left behind in the track from passenger footwear. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The headrest position is horrible for long trips. Felt like my head was being pushed forward. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
