Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Chrysler 200 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Convertible | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,766 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,778 mm | 4,948 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,877 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,425 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,603 kg | 1,733 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 64 L | -3 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 983 mm | 3 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 940 mm | -13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,143 mm | 1,232 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,148 mm | 1,123 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 851 mm | -94 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,928 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 272 L | 371 L | -99 L |
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chrysler 200.