Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2012 Chrysler Crossfire Chrysler Crossfire 2004

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2012) vs. Chrysler Crossfire (2004) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Ford Mustang and 2004 Chrysler Crossfire specs.

2012 Ford Mustang and 2004 Chrysler Crossfire Specifications

Model Year 2012 2004  
Model Ford Mustang Chrysler Crossfire  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang

2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review
2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed manual RWD
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review
2011 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed manual RWD
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire

2004 Chrysler Crossfire Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 2dr Hatch 215-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed manual RWD
There is none see full Chrysler Crossfire review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.