| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2014 Dodge Challenger Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2014 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Dodge Challenger | |
| Engine | 5.0L V8 DOHC-4v 435 hp@6500 400 lb-ft@4250 |
6.4L V8 OHV-2v 470 hp@6000 470 lb-ft@4300 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 116.0 in | -8.9 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 197.7 in | -9.4 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 75.7 in | -0.3 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 57.0 in | -2.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3729 lb. | 4045 lb. | -316 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.5 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 58.2 in | -1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 54.7 in | 0.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 42.0 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 37.4 in | -2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 53.9 in | -1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 51.4 in | -4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 32.6 in | -2 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 74.6 in (over 2 rows) | -2 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.5 ft3 | 16.2 ft3 | -2.7 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Dodge Challenger
| 2014 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 375-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
I am a large person, being 6'4" tall and about 250 lbs. This car fits me great, with plenty of room and comfort. I am the driver always (I live alone) and don't often have anyone else with me, although on occasion, I have a passenger. Even with large passengers there is plenty of room in the interior. I have a couple of inches of head room, which is pretty unique. Most cars require me to recline the seat a notch or two in order to avoid having my head in the headliner. I DID NOT purchase a vehicle with a sunroof. That device eats up 2 inches of head room, and I would be right there. Besides, we get a lot of rain here on the coast and I would be afraid of leaks. The seats are supportive, and I have the 6 way power driver's seat. It is easily adjustable for position and has the adjustable lumbar support. I cannot imagine anyone not being able to be comfortable. There is also plenty of leg room in the front seats. The back seats are useful in a pinch, but if I had a family, this would likely not be the best choice of vehicle for me. Although I love driving it, and looking at it! see full Dodge Challenger review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
