Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2013 Ford Expedition Ford Expedition 2000

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2013) vs. Ford Expedition (2000) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Ford Expedition specs.

2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Ford Expedition Specifications

Model Year 2013 2000  
Model Ford Mustang Ford Expedition  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang

2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed manual RWD
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford Expedition

2000 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2000 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
Rear bucket seats as comfortable and roomy as front row. see full Ford Expedition review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.