Model Year | 2016 | 2020 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,112 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,783 mm | 5,334 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,915 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,382 mm | 1,946 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 2,469 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 88 L | -27 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,067 mm | 954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,648 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,016 mm | 883 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 1,054 mm | 776 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 947 mm | -947 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,631 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,306 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 917 mm | -917 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,012 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 547 L | -165 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,628 L | 12.5 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,962 L | 11.5 |
2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Expedition.