

Model Year | 2022 | 2006 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 113.7 in | -6.6 in |
Length | 188.5 in | 193.4 in | -4.9 in |
Width | 75.4 in | 73.7 in | 1.7 in |
Height | 54.3 in | 72.8 in | -18.5 in |
Curb Weight | 3491 lb. | 4440 lb. | -949 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 15.5 gal. | 22.5 gal. | -7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.8 in | -2.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 59.0 in | -2.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 55.4 in | -0.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 42.4 in | 0.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 38.7 in | -3.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 58.9 in | -6.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 55.5 in | -8.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 29.0 in | 36.9 in | -7.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.4 in | -37.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 53.1 in | -53.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 45.3 in | -45.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 34.9 in | -34.9 in |
Total Legroom | 71.7 in (over 2 rows) | 114.2 in (over 3 rows) | -42.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 13.6 ft3 | -0.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 43.9 ft3 | -30.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 83.7 ft3 | -70.2 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Ford Mustang.
2006 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of room. Great even in the 3rd rear bench see full Ford Explorer review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room see full Ford Explorer review |