Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,765 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,877 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,407 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 61 L | 0 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 955 mm | 25 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,085 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 884 mm | -3 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,356 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 770 mm | 777 mm | -7 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 371 L | 382 L | -11 L |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.