| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2007 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2007 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | 5.2L V8 DOHC-4v 526 hp@7500 429 lb-ft@4750 |
supercharged 5.4L V8 DOHC-4v 500 hp@6000 480 lb-ft@4500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,681 kg | 1,778 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 61 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 980 mm | -25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 881 mm | 3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 770 mm | 7 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 382 L | 371 L | 11 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Mustang
| 2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
