| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2012 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | 5.2L V8 DOHC-4v 392 kW@7500 582 Nm@4750 |
supercharged 5.4L V8 DOHC-4v 410 kW@6000 691 Nm@4500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,778 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,681 kg | 1,730 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 61 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 978 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 881 mm | 3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 757 mm | 20 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 382 L | 379 L | 3 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
