Ford Mustang (2013) vs. Honda CR-V (2000) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Honda CR-V specs.
2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Honda CR-V Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2000 |
|
Model |
Ford Mustang |
Honda CR-V |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Honda CR-V
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.