| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 40 L | 21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,026 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 991 mm | -107 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 876 mm | -99 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 583 L | -201 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 1,623 L | 12.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
