Ford Mustang (2013) vs. (2009) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Mustang and 2009 specs.
2013 Ford Mustang and 2009 Specifications
| Model Year |
2013 |
2009 |
|
| Model |
Ford Mustang |
|
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
| 2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
| 2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.
