| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2006 Lincoln Navigator Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Lincoln Navigator | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 118.8 in | -11.7 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 207.5 in | -19.2 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 78.7 in | -3.3 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 77.7 in | -23.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 5555 lb. | -2029 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 28.0 gal. | -12 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.6 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 63.3 in | -7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 57.9 in | -3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.2 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.7 in | -4.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 63.4 in | -11.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 58.0 in | -10.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 38.7 in | -8.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.8 in | -37.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 52.3 in | -52.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.2 in | -50.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 116.2 in (over 3 rows) | -43.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 18.3 ft3 | -4.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 54.6 ft3 | -41.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 104.8 ft3 | -91.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Lincoln Navigator
| 2006 Lincoln Navigator Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The rear console is a bad idea. There's no way for the kids to get to the back seat while driving. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
The driver's seat is exceedingly comfortable. Its heating and cooling features work quickly and effectively. The adjustable lumbar support is in the right place to be effective without being intrusive, and the large cushion effectively supports the my legs. As an athlete who is almost always sore or injured, I very much appreciate that the seat is high enough off the floor that my lower legs are reasonably vertical. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
