| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Mustang and 2010 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 113.2 in | -6.1 in |
| Length | 188.1 in | 200.2 in | -12.1 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 76.2 in | -2.3 in |
| Height | 55.6 in | 68.0 in | -12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3447 lb. | 4330 lb. | -883 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 20.1 gal. | -4.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 39.6 in | -1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 59.4 in | -4.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 56.5 in | -3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.9 in | 1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 39.0 in | -4.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.6 in | 58.7 in | -7.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 56.0 in | -9.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 39.8 in | -10 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.4 in | -35.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 56.9 in | -56.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.7 in | -43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 32.4 in | -32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 113.1 in (over 3 rows) | -40.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 17.2 ft3 | -3.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 48.3 ft3 | -34.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 100.7 ft3 | -87.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda CX-9
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
