| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,006 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 991 mm | -107 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 1,011 mm | 776 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 487 L | -105 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,368 L | 12.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,852 L | 11.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
