Ford Mustang (2013) vs. Mazda Tribute (2000) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Mazda Tribute specs.
2013 Ford Mustang and 2000 Mazda Tribute Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2000 |
|
Model |
Ford Mustang |
Mazda Tribute |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Mazda Tribute
2001 |
4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
I have nice leather seats and the power drivers seat with lumbar control is very nice.
see full Mazda Tribute review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.