| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Mustang and 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 5,095 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,930 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 2,425 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 98 L | -37 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,019 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 1,031 mm | 880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 1,003 mm | 756 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 970 mm | -970 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,283 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 869 mm | -869 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,896 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 405 L | -26 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 1,240 L | 12.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 2,359 L | 11.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
| 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
