Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2016 Mercedes-Benz GLK Mercedes-Benz GLK 2009

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2016) vs. Mercedes-Benz GLK (2009) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Ford Mustang and 2009 Mercedes-Benz GLK specs.

2016 Ford Mustang and 2009 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications

Model Year 2016 2009  
Model Ford Mustang Mercedes-Benz GLK  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz GLK

2009 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
When the front seats are positioned comfortably aft for a six footer, the second row passengers have way too little leg room. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
2010 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Cramped and uncomfortable for anyone over 5 feet tall. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
2010 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Wife and I are 5.9 and 5.5 respectively. kids can easily kick the seat (whcih in the Benz you want there feet off things). Not bad in sense it feels roomy when in it, but if you are looking for LOTS of space, look elsewhere. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
2010 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
We've only had the GLK-350 for a week. The backseat seems a little on the small side. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
2010 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
small see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.