| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Mercedes-Benz M-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 114.7 in | -7.6 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 188.5 in | -0.2 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 75.2 in | 0.2 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 69.8 in | -15.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 4623 lb. | -1097 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 25.1 gal. | -9.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.9 in | -2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 59.9 in | -3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 55.0 in | -0.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 42.2 in | -0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.8 in | -5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 59.8 in | -7.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 0.0 in | 47.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 40.0 in | -9.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 82.2 in (over 2 rows) | -9.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 29.4 ft3 | -15.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 72.4 ft3 | -58.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Can drive this vehicle all day long and not be tired. see full Mercedes-Benz M-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seats with warmers are great see full Mercedes-Benz M-Class review |
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 288-horsepower 5.0L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Space is limited for adults in the back espically if the front passenger is tall. Seats are not bucket like the front so if driver takes a hard turn you go flying. see full Mercedes-Benz M-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
