| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2007 Nissan Pathfinder Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2007 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,984 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 80 L | -19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,016 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 1,013 mm | 880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 869 mm | -112 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 932 mm | -932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,118 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 714 mm | -714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,659 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 467 L | -88 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 1,393 L | 12.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 2,243 L | 11.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2007 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 266-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
The third row seating is only good for small children. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
