| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2006 Nissan Quest Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Nissan Quest | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 124.0 in | -16.9 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 204.1 in | -15.6 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 77.6 in | -3.7 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 71.9 in | -16.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 4012 lb. | -511 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 20.1 gal. | -4.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 41.9 in | -3.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 63.7 in | -8.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 65.6 in | -12.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 41.7 in | -7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 66.2 in | -18.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 67.4 in | -20.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 41.3 in | -11.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.6 in | -37.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.6 in | -61.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.0 in | -50 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 41.2 in | -41.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 124.2 in (over 3 rows) | -52 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 32.3 ft3 | -18.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 87.7 ft3 | -74.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 148.7 ft3 | -135.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Quest
| 2006 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
| 2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET see full Nissan Quest review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
