| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2014 Nissan Quest Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2014 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Nissan Quest | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,000 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 5,100 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,971 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,816 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,981 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,069 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,638 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,113 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,057 mm | 883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,676 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 932 mm | -155 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,016 mm | -1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,554 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,260 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,029 mm | -1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,073 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 994 L | -612 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,801 L | 12.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 3,070 L | 10.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Nissan Quest
| 2014 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 260-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT FWD |
Here's the main reason I bought this van: my kids! Of all the vans we tested, they believed the second and third row seats were the most comfortable. Some may laugh at the boxy shape and fat rear end of the Quest, but the reason it's designed that way is because it maximizes interior room. I'm 6'1" (taller in the torso than legs) and even I think the van is spacious when I sit in the third row. The head and shoulder room is incredible. The seats are all very comfortable. The soft suspension makes riding as a passenger a pleasure. So, despite all the shortcomings I mention in this review, in my opinion, the Quest tops all the competitors in the category of passenger and driver comfort. The pleasing and luxurious interior materials contribute to this. Too bad the production of this iteration of the Quest appears to be in its final chapter. see full Nissan Quest review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
