Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003 Pontiac G6 Pontiac G6 2010

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Pontiac G6 (2010) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2010 Pontiac G6 specs.

2003 Ford Mustang and 2010 Pontiac G6 Specifications

Model Year 2003 2010  
Model Ford Mustang Pontiac G6  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Pontiac G6

2010 Pontiac G6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 219-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
Extremely uncomfortable driver seat. This was the base model with cloth manual seats. They are too hard . see full Pontiac G6 review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.