| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Ford Mustang and 2013 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 103.0 in | 4.1 in |
| Length | 187.6 in | 169.5 in | 18.1 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 70.1 in | 3.8 in |
| Height | 55.4 in | 65.9 in | -10.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3373 lb. | 3250 lb. | 123 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 16.9 gal. | -0.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 41.6 in | -3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 56.1 in | -0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.6 in | 0.0 in | 53.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 43.1 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 40.0 in | -5.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.4 in | 55.6 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 0.0 in | 46.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.3 in | 38.0 in | -7.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | -8.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.1 ft3 | 33.5 ft3 | -20.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.1 ft3 | 68.3 ft3 | -55.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Mustang
| 2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Subaru Forester
| 2013 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Beyond visibility, people buy crossovers to get more space for people and cargo. As in previous Subaru Foresters, the 2014's ceiling is cathedral-high. I could have worn a top hat inside. If you're very tall, and have been seeking a compact vehicle in which you'll easily fit, you've found one. If, on the other hand, you've been seeking expansive elbow room, the Honda CR-V has more of it. And legroom? A combined (first and second row) figure of 81 inches tops every other compact SUV, including the otherwise segment-leading Honda (79.6 inches) and Toyota RAV-4 (79.8 inches). The Chevrolet Equinox offers another tenth of an inch, but with a 188-inch length (vs. the Forester's 181) and 4,083-pound curb weight (vs. the Forester 2.5i's 3,366) it's not truly compact. Subaru has worked no such miracles with shoulder room. At 56.5 inches, the Forester's is typical of the compact crossover class. Add in a small driveline hump (absent in the Honda) and three adults won't happily share the rear seat for long. But how many car owners put three adult-sized people in the second row for long, anyway? Measurements don't tell the entire story. The Honda's rear seat cushion is too low to the floor to provide adults with thigh support, and its rear seatback can be reclined to only two nearly identical positions. In constrast, the Forester's passengers enjoy a comfortably high rear seat that reclines through a broader range. One negative for rear seat comfort: unlike the Ford Escape (but like nearly all other compact crossovers, including the CR-V), the Forester has no rear air vents. Thanks to the tall, square rear body, cargo space is also the best in the segment, though not by as large a margin as the rear seat. Up front, there are plenty of bins in which to stash your stuff. see full Subaru Forester review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Subaru Forester
| 2013 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
Huge rear seat for the car's size see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
Excellent rear seat comfort and rear seats are 60/ 40 and easy to fold flat. rear seats also have recline function which is nice ... excellent leg room see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
