| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Ford Mustang and 2018 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,595 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,687 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,507 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 60 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,052 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,092 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,011 mm | 883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 965 mm | -188 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,057 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 974 L | -592 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,115 L | 11.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Subaru Forester
| 2018 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
