Ford Mustang (2007) vs. Subaru Outback (2006) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Ford Mustang and 2006 Subaru Outback Specifications

Model Year	2007	2006
Model	Ford Mustang	Subaru Outback
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	2dr Coupe	4dr Sedan
			Difference
Wheelbase	107.1 in	105.1 in	2 in
Length	187.6 in	186.2 in	1.4 in
Width	73.9 in	69.7 in	4.2 in
Height	55.4 in	59.1 in	-3.7 in
Curb Weight	3373 lb.	3350 lb.	23 lb.
Fuel Capacity	16.0 gal.	16.9 gal.	-0.9 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.6 in	37.6 in	1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	55.4 in	54.4 in	1 in
Hip Room, Row 1	53.6 in	51.0 in	2.6 in
Legroom, Row 1	42.7 in	44.1 in	-1.4 in
Headroom, Row 2	34.7 in	36.5 in	-1.8 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	53.4 in	53.7 in	-0.3 in
Hip Room, Row 2	46.8 in	52.6 in	-5.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	30.3 in	33.9 in	-3.6 in
Total Legroom	73 in (over 2 rows)	78 in (over 2 rows)	-5 in
Cargo Volume	13.1 ft³	11.4 ft³	1.7 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Mustang

2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2006	2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD	seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review

2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD	waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review
2008	2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD	There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review
2007	2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD	While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Outback

2006 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Leg and head room lacking for over 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Seat back a bit low for 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	I was amazed at how small the back seat is in this car. Really no bigger than a compact sedan, eg Civic or Corolla. I can't fit my 3 kids (in car seats) back there, and feel bad when co-workers pile in to go to lunch. Surprisingly small for a vehicle this size, and marketed as a "family car." If you plan to put adults or 3 kids back there regularly, look at the '10 or newer (or at something else -- the rear seat in my co-worker's Accord is far bigger and more comfortable). see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Too small for kids see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Too short! I am 6ft tall and the front passenger seat leaves me feeling very cramped. Drivers position is better. Seats also too narrow. Maybe plenty of room for skinny folks, but not for us folks that are large boned :-) see full Subaru Outback review
2005	4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	The Outback is much smaller (but not cheaper) than the XC70. see full Subaru Outback review
2005	4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	very tight and narrow rear seat room. feels much bumpier in the rear seat than the front seat. see full Subaru Outback review

See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.