| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2010 Suzuki SX4 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Suzuki SX4 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 98.4 in | 8.7 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 176.8 in | 11.5 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 68.1 in | 7.3 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 60.8 in | -6.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 2723 lb. | 803 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.6 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 53.3 in | 3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 51.0 in | 3.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.4 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 37.6 in | -2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 52.8 in | -0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 42.6 in | 4.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 35.8 in | -5.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | -4.6 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.5 ft3 | 15.0 ft3 | -1.5 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Suzuki SX4
| 2010 Suzuki SX4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 143-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual 4WD |
Adults can sit back there without bending into a pretzel see full Suzuki SX4 review |
| 2010 Suzuki SX4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 150-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual 4WD |
Very little room for driver and passengers. Driver is almost touching windshield by a forehead. A small leg room too especially for driver and rear passengers. see full Suzuki SX4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 143-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD |
I will say the rear seat was fairly comfortable although my hair was brushing up against the ceiling. Impossible to put 4 people in this car comfortably. see full Suzuki SX4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 143-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD |
Space behind rear seats unacceptable. see full Suzuki SX4 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
