| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2010 Toyota Avalon Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Avalon | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 5,009 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,585 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 986 mm | -8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 953 mm | -72 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 1,039 mm | 756 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,088 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 379 L | 408 L | -29 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Avalon
| 2010 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Heated seats are wonderful in winter. Dual zone heater/air conditioner a plus for driver/passenger comfort. Back-up camera is handy for checking what the mirrors don't pick up. Quiet, smooth engine/transmission. Comfortable seats are easily adjustable. Easy access and good leg-room in rear seats. see full Toyota Avalon review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Heated seats are wonderful in winter. Dual zone heater/air conditioner a plus for driver/passenger comfort. Back-up camera is handy for checking what the mirrors don't pick up. Quiet, smooth engine/transmission. Comfortable seats are easily adjustable. Easy access and good leg-room in rear seats. see full Toyota Avalon review |
| 2010 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seats are too short. Toyota seats are generally not comfortable, but for a car in this price range I would have expected better. see full Toyota Avalon review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
