Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003 Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2009

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Toyota Camry (2009) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2009 Toyota Camry specs.

2003 Ford Mustang and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications

Model Year 2003 2009  
Model Ford Mustang Toyota Camry  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry

2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review
2009 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review
2008 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review
2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review
2009 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review
2008 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.