| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2010 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,821 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,480 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 986 mm | -8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 960 mm | -79 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 973 mm | -216 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 379 L | 425 L | -46 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
