Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Camry | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,783 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,915 mm | 1,821 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,382 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,480 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 986 mm | -31 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 960 mm | -76 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 973 mm | -196 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 382 L | 425 L | -43 L |
2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |