| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2012 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 50 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,029 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 998 mm | -117 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 919 mm | -162 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 561 L | -182 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 1,741 L | 12.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
