| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2008 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2008 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,215 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 50 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,031 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,011 mm | 883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 922 mm | -145 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 617 L | -235 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 1,506 L | 12.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota Matrix
| 2008 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2008 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
