Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Toyota Prius (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2017 Toyota Prius specs.
2003 Ford Mustang and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year |
2003 |
2017 |
|
| Model |
Ford Mustang |
Toyota Prius |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor.
see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats.
But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker.
see full Ford Mustang review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.
