| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2008 Volvo V50 Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2008 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo V50 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 103.9 in | 3.2 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 177.7 in | 10.8 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 69.7 in | 4.2 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 57.2 in | -1.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3630 lb. | 3326 lb. | 304 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. | 0.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 38.9 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 55.2 in | 0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 53.7 in | -0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.5 in | 38.1 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 45.0 in | 54.1 in | -9.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 45.2 in | 50.7 in | -5.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 34.4 in | -4.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | -3.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.6 ft3 | 27.4 ft3 | -17.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 9.6 ft3 | 62.9 ft3 | -53.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Volvo V50
| 2008 Volvo V50 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.4L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is top notch. Lots of adjustments with power drivers seat. see full Volvo V50 review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I5 5-speed manual FWD |
It has a lot of arm and leg room for a smaller car. see full Volvo V50 review |
| 2008 Volvo V50 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Wagon turbocharged 218hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat is for very small people or children only --no leg room. see full Volvo V50 review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I5 5-speed manual FWD |
Not a lot of room for tall adults. Good for kids. see full Volvo V50 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
