| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2015 Volvo XC60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo XC60 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 109.2 in | -2.1 in |
| Length | 188.3 in | 182.8 in | 5.5 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 74.4 in | 1 in |
| Height | 54.4 in | 67.4 in | -13 in |
| Curb Weight | 3526 lb. | 4041 lb. | -515 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -2.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 39.1 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 56.7 in | -0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 54.2 in | 0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 41.2 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.5 in | -4.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.2 in | 55.2 in | -3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.4 in | 53.8 in | -6.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 30.6 in | 36.4 in | -5.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 77.6 in (over 2 rows) | -5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.5 ft3 | 30.8 ft3 | -17.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 ft3 | 67.4 ft3 | -53.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volvo XC60
| 2015 Volvo XC60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Volvos have long been renowned for seat comfort, and the XC60 continues this tradition with seats that are thoroughly supportive without being as firm as those in the Cadillac and in the German crossovers. This said, some people might find the headrests overly intrusive. The Inscription Package adds power lumbar adjusters to both seats. Otherwise these adjusters are manual. Notable in its absence: front seat ventilation, offered in the Audi and Cadillac, isn't an option in the XC60. Also, no massage. see full Volvo XC60 review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volvo XC60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volvo XC60.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
