| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2007 Volvo XC90 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2007 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo XC90 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 2,061 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 80 L | -19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,008 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 975 mm | -91 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 879 mm | -102 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 902 mm | -902 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 765 mm | -765 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,685 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 249 L | 133 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,226 L | 12.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,410 L | 11.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Volvo XC90
| 2007 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
3rd row very roomy. 2nd row very comfortable. see full Volvo XC90 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Comfortable. see full Volvo XC90 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Wife and two car seats fit in back. see full Volvo XC90 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Comfortable. see full Volvo XC90 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
7 passenger capacity. see full Volvo XC90 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
