Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 Chrysler 300M Chrysler 300M 2004

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2008) vs. Chrysler 300M (2004) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2008 Ford Ranger and 2004 Chrysler 300M specs.

2008 Ford Ranger and 2004 Chrysler 300M Specifications

Model Year 2008 2004  
Model Ford Ranger Chrysler 300M  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Ford Ranger

2008 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chrysler 300M

2004 Chrysler 300M Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
It was a very comfortable ride. see full Chrysler 300M review
2005 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Lots of leg room, comfortable seats. see full Chrysler 300M review
2004 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Perfect for long drives. Maybe could be a little higher up (we recently rented a Mercury Sable ie Ford Taurus that is higher up & easier for entry/exit). But the seats fit like a glove on the 300M! see full Chrysler 300M review
2004 Chrysler 300M Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Seat cushion provided little support. see full Chrysler 300M review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.