| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Taurus and 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,868 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,154 mm | 4,656 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,542 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,800 kg | 1,485 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 63 L | 13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 991 mm | 1,031 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 975 mm | -15 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,417 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 947 mm | 21 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,285 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,001 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 716 mm | -716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 569 L | 292 L | 277 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.1 | 968 L | -947.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 20.1 | 1,792 L | 19.1 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
