| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Taurus and 2000 Toyota Avalon Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2000 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus | Toyota Avalon | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Toyota Avalon
| 2000 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2000 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
My passengers always comment on how much leg room they have and the use of the middle, oversize arm rest that can be used on long trips. see full Toyota Avalon review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
