| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Taurus and 2000 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2000 | |
| Model | Ford Taurus | Toyota Sienna | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Toyota Sienna
| 2000 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2000 | 3dr Minivan, ext. 194-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Great for children. They can see out the window. They have leg room with front seats pushed all the way back. Easy to get car seats in and out. Seats are separate so no fighting over space. see full Toyota Sienna review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
